Editorial and Sourcing Policy
Effective
- This page states how we work, not a college figure — it carries no fees, cut-offs or placement numbers.
- Something here is wrong or out of date? Tell us and we will correct it.
This policy defines how changing admission information is researched, labelled and corrected. It is designed to keep advice traceable to the document that supports it.
Source hierarchy
- Government counselling, examination and regulatory authorities.
- The institution's official prospectus, fee notice, disclosure or placement report.
- Other primary records that identify the issuing organisation and period.
Aggregator pages are not used as proof for fees, cut-offs or placement outcomes.
Years, dates and missing fields
A changing figure should carry its academic year or counselling cycle. A publication or update date appears only when that work actually occurred. If a necessary figure is not verified, the draft keeps an explicit missing-figure marker and stays out of search indexing until the publishing gate is met.
Recommendations and comparisons
Comparisons separate documented facts from calculations and user-entered scenarios. Highest-package claims are not treated as a typical outcome. Unknown values are not replaced with invented industry averages. Counselling suitability depends on the student's route, score, category, domicile, budget and goals.
People and review credits
A visible author identifies who prepared the page. Hrithik Ranjan reviews every page for factual accuracy before its initial publication, and the visible credit must match the page-level reviewedBy structured data. Testimonials, star ratings and aggregate-review schema are not created without a verifiable public source.
Corrections
Send the page URL, disputed statement and supporting official document to contact@futurecareerguidance.com. A corrected page receives a new modified date only when its substantive content changes.